Hill v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that information was not fatally defective because `while defendant's name did not appear in the charging part of the information, it did clearly appear in the caption and in the verification of the charge by the District Attorney'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Nixon
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-12-03· cited 61×
• State v. Furner
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1978-06-27· cited 16×
• Finney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-10-25· cited 10×
• Lane v. Torvinen
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1981-03-19· cited 9×
• State v. Akers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-09· cited 5×
• Ex Parte State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-12-20· cited 4×
• Foy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-09-16· cited 2×
• State v. Danny King
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1998-10-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wing v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1971-11-17· cited 25×
• In Re Porter's Estate
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1953-05-19· cited 17×
• Tilley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-06-13· cited 11×
• Lippoldt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1954-05-19· cited 4×