Hill v. Rieth-Riley Const. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because particular guardrail was not always dangerous and posed problem only when hit by vehicle in particular manner, such danger was not sufficient to impose liability on contractor who installed guardrail
• observing that guardrail is a safety device designated to prevent greater harm from occurring to errant vehicles
• observing that guardrail is a safety device designated to prevent greater harm from occurring to errant vehicles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).