Hill v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where counsel failed to address issues in an Anders brief/no merit letter that were raised in the petition for review, counsel was precluded from withdrawing
• “Although we do not encourage or condone the pursuit of frivolous challenges, we will not tolerate the compromise of an individual’s right to representation on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).