Hill v. Norton & Young, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the claimant, who was not represented by counsel, made statements from which an objection 19 to hearsay testimony could be inferred, where she claimed that if the hearsay statement was actually made, “it was a lie”
• in order to show misconduct, “the employer must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the claimant willfully violated the rules or standards of the employer or that the claimant knowingly acted against the employer’s interest”
• claimant made statements from which an objection could be inferred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).