District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/12/2003
Hill v. Murphy
Citations
- 872 So. 2d 919
- 2003 WL 22103603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a complaint alleging damages in excess of $15,000 was not sufficiently definite to establish liquidated damages
- holding a conclusory assertion that a meritorious defense exists is insufficient
- reversing order denying motion to set aside judgment where defaulted party was not served with order setting damages trial
- \Damages are liquidated when they can be determined by mathematical calculation or the application of definite rules of law.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Villanti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Geer v. JacobsenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-07· cited 48×
- Ciprian-Escapa v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-17· cited 10×
- Watson v. Internet Billing Co., Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-22· cited 9×
- Rivera v. Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-22· cited 7×
- Rodriguez v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-20· cited 2×
- JANIEL RODRIGUEZ v. JOHNNY FALCONESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-12-02
- Xpress Title, Inc. v. Jason M. Wandner, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-17
- Eliduvir Carvajal Sanchez v. Milagros IrizarryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-10-30
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-02· cited 104×
- Pierce v. AnglinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-04· cited 19×
- COQUINA BEACH CLUB CONDOMINIUM v. WagnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-19· cited 17×
- Parlier v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-20· cited 14×
- Consuegra v. Lloyd's Underwriters at LondonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-12· cited 14×
- Collins v. CollinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-05· cited 11×
- Abray Construction Company, Inc. v. Star Swimming Pools, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-21· cited 10×
- Fiera. Com, Inc. v. DigiCast New Media Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-11· cited 9×
- Tand v. CFS Bakeries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-03· cited 8×
- Medcom USA, Inc. v. RYDER HOMES AND GROVES CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-20· cited 6×
- Charlotte Harbor Properties Associates, Ltd. v. HuffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.