Hill v. Medlantic Health Care Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that judgment for defendant was properly granted on the loss of consortium claim after plaintiff could not establish that defendant was negligent
• concluding that,judgment for defendant was, properly granted on the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim after plaintiff could not establish that defendant was negligent
• observing that civil conspiracy “is not an independent tort but only a means for establishing vicarious liability for an underlying tort” (quoting Paul v. Howard Univ., 754 A.2d 297, 310 (D.C. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).