Hill v. Maxwell
Citations
- 71 Kan. 72
- 79 P. 1088
- 1905 Kan. LEXIS 92
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Contracts — Sale of Real Estate — Subsequent Oral Agreement Fully Executed — Parol Evidence. In an action by a vendor against a purchaser for a balance claimed to be due on account of the sale of a tract of land the defendant may show that at the time appointed for closing the transaction a controversy arose between the parties over the terms of the sale, and that the disputed matter was settled by the payment of a less sum than the seller claimed to be due, and a delivery of the deed to the land, even though a written memorandum of the original agreement had been made, and notwithstanding the statute of frauds.</p>
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coonrod & Walz Construction Co. v. Motel Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-05-10· cited 24×
- Bailey v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1955-05-07· cited 13×
- Gibbs v. ErbertSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-03-04· cited 10×
- Saddlewood Downs, L.L.C. v. Holland Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-10-29· cited 10×
- Haas v. NemethSupreme Court of Kansas· 1934-04-07· cited 7×
- Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co.D. Kansas· 2010-03-16· cited 6×
- Falk v. FultonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-01-07· cited 6×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.