Hill v. Lamberth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a principal’s decision about school security was a discretionary one and “inappropriate” for “judicial second-guessing”
• noting that this Court is permitted to affirm dismissal on grounds different than those cited by the trial court
• “[T]his Court may affirm the trial court’s decision when rendered on different grounds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).