D. Maryland· 1/19/1967
Hill v. Huddleston
Citations
- 263 F. Supp. 108
- 10 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 803
- 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the law of the state with the most significant relationship with the communications made to a psychiatrist in Maiyland
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hardy v. RiserN.D. Mississippi· 1970-02-09· cited 34×
- Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Puerto Rico Water Resources AuthorityD. Puerto Rico· 1978-06-02· cited 32×
- Lind v. Canada Dry CorporationD. Minnesota· 1968-04-26· cited 26×
- Hare v. Family Publications Service, Inc.D. Maryland· 1971-12-03· cited 19×
- Baylor v. Mading-Dugan Drug Co.N.D. Illinois· 1972-12-18· cited 15×
- Union Planters National Bank of Memphis v. ABC Records, Inc.W.D. Tennessee· 1979-06-05· cited 6×
- Whatley v. Merit Distribution ServicesS.D. Alabama· 2000-02-16
- Lukee Enterprises, Inc. v. New York Life InsuranceD. New Mexico· 1971-03-12
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- White v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-11-11· cited 130×
- Doughty v. PrettymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-02-16· cited 77×
- John M. Palmer v. Alice Bradley Fisher, as of the Estate of Frederick T. Fisher, Deceased, Petition of Thomas F. PierceSeventh Circuit· 1956-01-26· cited 51×
- Application of CepedaS.D. New York· 1964-08-14· cited 24×
- Ex parte SparrowN.D. Alabama· 1953-05-19· cited 20×
- Dukes v. Eastern Tar Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1951-04-13· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.