Skip to main content
· 10/9/1916

Hill v. Hittel

Citations

  • 64 Pa. Super. 317
  • 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 296

Syllabus

<p>Equity — Injunction — Mandatory injunction — 0 bstruction of right of way.</p> <p>A court of equity will not award a mandatory injunction to compel the removal of a platform scale from land which the defendant owned in fee, on the ground that it obstructed an easement of way which an adjoining owner had in the land to enable him to reach a public highway, where the court below finds as a fact, that the interference was so slight as to be unappreciable, and that the defendant was willing to have a decree entered under which he would complete the improvement in such a way as not only to remove the slight inconvenience caused by the scale, but also to make the condition of the way better and more satisfactory than it had previously been.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dog, loose and following the person in charge of him at such a distance that the person could not exercise that control over the dog which would prevent mischief, was “going at large”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bice, Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.