Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/2/2017

Hill v. Hill

Citations

2017 Ohio 2625

Syllabus

Domestic relations court did not modify the settlement or abuse its discretion by offsetting obligations of the parties to enforce their settlement agreement. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Brunner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Hill v. Hill
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-27· cited 3×
Estate of Mullinix v. Mullinix
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
State v. Dehass
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
United States v. United Mine Workers of America
Supreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
Berk v. Matthews
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 987×
Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County Commissioners
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-03-23· cited 305×
Windham Bank v. Tomaszczyk
Ohio Supreme Court· 1971-06-30· cited 287×
Stewart v. Treasurer
Ohio Supreme Court· 1829-12-15· cited 5×
King v. King
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-08· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.