Supreme Court of Florida· 1/25/2001
Hill v. Hill
Citations
- 778 So. 2d 967
- 2001 WL 58468
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court assumed correct absent a record that demonstrates error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Langdon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-17· cited 33×
- Tanner v. BeckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-01· cited 20×
- Williams v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-02· cited 12×
- Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-03· cited 4×
- Burton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-12· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-10-04· cited 1,882×
- Reaves v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-03· cited 23×
- Gregory v. GregoryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-02-06· cited 5×
- In Re Adoption of AMLDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-07-24· cited 4×
- Hill v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.