Hill v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a judgment setting aside a previous judgment based on a conclusion that a false averment made intentionally in a joint petition to a trial court amounted to fraud on the 13 CL-2024-0295 and CL-2024-0296 court
• affirming a judgment setting aside a previous judgment based on a conclusion that a false averment made intentionally in a joint petition to a trial court amounted to fraud on the 13 CL-2024-0295 and CL-2024-0296 court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Waters v. Jolly
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-05-24· cited 30×
• Burlington Northern R. Co. v. Warren
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-12-21· cited 17×
• Lesnick v. Lesnick
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-03-08· cited 14×
• Moore v. Moore
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2002-10-18· cited 4×
• Peak v. Parks
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2003-06-30· cited 3×
• Ex parte Gage Bruce Roberts PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Gage Bruce Roberts v. Taylor Rose Roberts) (Mobile Circuit Court: DR-22-901220.02)
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2024-07-26
• Ex parte Gage Bruce Roberts PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Gage Bruce Roberts v. Taylor Rose Roberts) (Mobile Circuit Court: DR-22-901220.01)
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2024-07-26

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brice v. Brice
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1976-09-24· cited 20×
• Denton v. Sanford
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-03-26· cited 16×
• Crisco v. Crisco
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1975-05-08· cited 16×