Hill v. Hardy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the defendant did not have a subjective expectation of privacy in an open garage when he had an opportunity to demonstrate an expectation of privacy or ask the police to leave, but instead did nothing
• “If the officer was not to approach [an open garage where a disturbance was occurring] ..., appellant had ample opportunity to in some manner demonstrate an expectation of privacy in the garage. Instead, he did nothing.” (citing State v. Easterling, 257 S.C. 239, 185 S.E.2d 366 (1971)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).