· 3/21/2014
['Hill v. Gray']
Citations
- 28 F. Supp. 3d 47
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37180
- 2014 WL 1118005
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An employee’s resignation or retirement, when the only other available option for the employee is removal by the employer for valid reasons, does not qualify as constructive discharge.”
- “An employee’s resignation or retirement, when the only other available option for the employee is removal by the employer for valid reasons, does not qualify as constructive discharge.”
- “Because the Office of Employee Appeals did not address Ms. Hill’s discrimination claim under Title VII or the ADEA, and because the Office of Employee Appeals’ final order is ‘judicially unreviewed,’ there is no preclusive effect on Ms. 6 Hill’s discrimination claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.