Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/12/2022
Hill v. Gold
Citations
- 322 Or. App. 324
- 519 P.3d 543
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that cases determining “fair value” under dissenter’s rights statute inform the mean- ing of “fair value” for purposes of ORS 60.952(5)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mooney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 75×
- Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-01-11· cited 42×
- Columbia Management Co. v. WyssCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-11-30· cited 40×
- Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-05-24· cited 24×
- Hayes v. Olmsted & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-28· cited 17×
- Cooke v. Fresh Express Foods Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-07-12· cited 11×
- Hickey v. HickeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-25· cited 7×
- G. I. Joe's, Inc. v. NizamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-31· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.