Skip to main content
· 12/1/1998

Hill v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE STATE OF MO.

Citations

  • 985 S.W.2d 824
  • 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2131
  • 1998 WL 823121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the observation requirement is satisfied once a single 15-minute observation period is observed and an additional observation period of 15 minutes between subsequent tests is not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spinden, Ulrich, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.