Skip to main content
· 5/1/2012

Hill v. Director of Revenue

Citations

  • 364 S.W.3d 545
  • 2012 WL 1520713
  • 2012 Mo. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing circuit court’s reinstatement of driving privileges, because the driver’s “conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia is unquestionably an offense ‘related to . . . drugs’ as required by section 302.060.1(9).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard B. Teitelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.