Hill v. Didio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even if a third-party retaliation claim was cognizable under Title VII, plaintiff failed to show that employer’s actions “amount[ed] to materially adverse changes in [plaintiff's] work conditions”
• “This Circuit has not yet decided whether third party retaliation claims are cognizable under Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).