Skip to main content
· 10/15/2008

Hill v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

Citations

  • 582 F. Supp. 2d 1041
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81732
  • 2008 WL 4604165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying the plaintiff more time to meet Section 2-622 requirements because the plaintiff should have known, from the outset, that it would need to comply with the state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael P. McCuskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.