Skip to main content
· 11/22/2010

Hill v. Coppleson

Citations

  • 627 F.3d 601
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23940
  • 2010 WL 4702454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prosecutor was not entitled to absolute or qualified immunity because the \resolution depends on facts that the district court has properly determined to be in dispute\
  • holding that a prosecutor was not entitled to absolute or qualified immunity because the “resolution depends on facts that the district court has properly determined to be in dispute”
  • noting that probable cause plays a “part” in the immunity inquiry
  • stating district court properly denied summary judgment because absolute immunity depended on a probable-cause question which turned on a disputed issue of fact regarding when the confession occurred
  • prosecutor alleged to have fed plaintiff details about murder he later confessed to
  • prosecutor alleged to have fed plaintiff details about murder he later confessed to

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Williams, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.