· 11/22/2010
Hill v. Coppleson
Citations
- 627 F.3d 601
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23940
- 2010 WL 4702454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prosecutor was not entitled to absolute or qualified immunity because the \resolution depends on facts that the district court has properly determined to be in dispute\
- holding that a prosecutor was not entitled to absolute or qualified immunity because the “resolution depends on facts that the district court has properly determined to be in dispute”
- noting that probable cause plays a “part” in the immunity inquiry
- stating district court properly denied summary judgment because absolute immunity depended on a probable-cause question which turned on a disputed issue of fact regarding when the confession occurred
- prosecutor alleged to have fed plaintiff details about murder he later confessed to
- prosecutor alleged to have fed plaintiff details about murder he later confessed to
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ripple, Williams, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.