· 2/17/1983
Hill v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare
Citations
- 72 Pa. Commw. 149
- 455 A.2d 1291
- 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1341
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court has jurisdiction to adjudicate an appeal from a district court’s or- der “refusing” to issue a preliminary injunction
- holding that the court has jurisdiction to adjudicate an appeal from a district court’s or- der “refusing” to issue a preliminary injunction
- finding district court did not abuse its discretion in denying preliminary injunction where it found no adequate remedy at law and no irreparable harm
- “[Sec- tion 1292(a)(1)] is a limited exception to the final-judgment rule, and we construe it narrowly.”
- “[Sec- tion 1292(a)(1)] is a limited exception to the final-judgment rule, and we construe it narrowly.”
- “[Sec- tion 1292(a)(1)] is a limited exception to the final-judgment rule, and we construe it narrowly.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doyle, MacPhail, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.