Skip to main content
· 2/17/1983

Hill v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare

Citations

  • 72 Pa. Commw. 149
  • 455 A.2d 1291
  • 1983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court has jurisdiction to adjudicate an appeal from a district court’s or- der “refusing” to issue a preliminary injunction
  • holding that the court has jurisdiction to adjudicate an appeal from a district court’s or- der “refusing” to issue a preliminary injunction
  • finding district court did not abuse its discretion in denying preliminary injunction where it found no adequate remedy at law and no irreparable harm
  • “[Sec- tion 1292(a)(1)] is a limited exception to the final-judgment rule, and we construe it narrowly.”
  • “[Sec- tion 1292(a)(1)] is a limited exception to the final-judgment rule, and we construe it narrowly.”
  • “[Sec- tion 1292(a)(1)] is a limited exception to the final-judgment rule, and we construe it narrowly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, MacPhail, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.