Skip to main content

Hill v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 88 Va. 633
  • 14 S.E. 330
  • 1892 Va. LEXIS 14

Syllabus

<p>1. Criminal Proceedings— Witnesses for commonwealth. — The prosecution is not bound to call every witness present at the transaction which is the subject of the indictment.</p> <p>2. Idem — Rule.—It is for the commonwealth’s attorney to say what witnesses he will call. If there be any material witness not called by him, defendant may call him. It is, however, in the discretion of the trial judge to call any witness present at the transaction, or whose name is on the indictment; and the witness, not being' the witness of either party, may he examined or cross-examined by both sides.</p> <p>9. Idem — Instructions.—Though an instruction correctly propounds the law, yet. if it he irrelevant to the issue;</p> <p>Held :■</p> <p>Xot error to refuse to give it.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a court’s discretion to call witnesses is “to be very cautiously exercised”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.