Hill v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the wages of fishing-vessel crew members were tied to the value of their catch
• finding existence of related suit to pose danger of duplicative recoveries
• “The chain of causation 18 between the injury and the alleged restraint in the market should lead directly to the ‘immediate 19 victims’ of any alleged antitrust violation”
• “The chain 10 of causation between the injury and the alleged restraint in the market should lead directly to the 11 ‘immediate victims’ of any alleged antitrust violation”
• “the part alleging the injury must be either a 17 consumer of the alleged violator’s goods or services or a competitor of the alleged violate in the 18 restrained market”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).