Hill v. City of Burlington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that isolated references to contract conditions unenforceable because \a vague implication of rights cannot prevail over the clear and express provisions of [the contract]\
• holding that isolated references to contract conditions unenforceable because “a vague implication of rights cannot prevail over the clear and express provisions of [the contract]”
• otherwise reasonable implication may not contradict clear and express language of contract
• contracts must be enforced “as written”
• contracts must be enforced \as written\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).