Skip to main content
· 8/7/1992

Hill v. Chicago Housing Authority

Citations

  • 599 N.E.2d 1118
  • 233 Ill. App. 3d 923
  • 175 Ill. Dec. 104
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where party moving for summary judgment met its burden of presenting facts that, if uncontradicted, would entitle it to a judgment as a matter of law.
  • section 4-102 barred recovery against housing authority for failure to provide adequate police services so as to prevent shooting of visitor in lobby of housing project
  • no duty to protect the plaintiff from the criminal act where affidavits established that the Chicago Housing Authority hired the security agency to protect only property
  • section 4-102 barred recovery against housing authority for failure to provide adequate police services so as to prevent shooting of visitor in lobby of housing project
  • where party moving for summary judgment met its burden of presenting facts that, if uncontradicted, would entitle it to a judgment as a matter of law.
  • no duty to protect the plaintiff from the criminal act where affidavits established that the Chicago Housing Authority hired the security agency to protect only property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.