Hill v. Calkins
Citations
- 91 Wash. 634
- 158 P. 347
- 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1111
Syllabus
<p>Taxation — Sales—Remedies ojt Owner — Attack on Void Sales —Tender. In replevin hy a vendee to recover property conditionally sold, in which the defense was that the property had been sold for taxes alleged to he a valid lien, plaintiffs reply that the property was distrained and sold for the taxes of another who was never the owner of the property, is not an attack upon the validity of a tax, and so is not within Rem. & Bal. Code, §§ 955, 956, making tender of the tax justly due a condition precedent to an action to recover property sold for taxes.</p>
Judges: Eullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.