Skip to main content
· 10/13/2010

Hill v. Calderin

Citations

  • 47 So. 3d 852
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15570
  • 2010 WL 3985121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even in the absence of a transcript, an appellate court may consider an error that is apparent on the face of the judgment
  • “Notwithstanding the absence of a transcript, however, an appellate court may review a lower court judgment for error apparent on its face.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gersten, Shepherd, and Suarez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.