Hill v. Board of Trustees of the Retirement System of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unless “the motion for rehearing is so indefinite, vague, and general as to constitute no motion for rehearing at all,” the inadequacy or insufficiency of the contents of the motion are not “jurisdictional and go solely to the issue of preservation of error”
• holding that unless “the motion for rehearing is so indefinite, vague, and general as to constitute no motion for rehearing at all,” the inadequacy or insufficiency of the contents of the motion are not “jurisdictional and go solely to the issue of preservation of error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).