Skip to main content
· 3/30/2004

Hill v. BellSouth Corp.

Citations

  • 313 F. Supp. 2d 1361
  • 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1993
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6045
  • 2004 WL 737085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, under a duty to avoid conflicts of interest theory, the key issue was whether the fiduciary was acting as a fiduciary at the time
  • denying motion to dismiss prudence claim where there were press releases and SEC reports showing accounting errors, and there was evidence of economic and political instability in Latin America where the company was targeting 10 percent of its business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forrester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.