Skip to main content
· 4/2/1991

Hill v. Baltimore County

Citations

  • 587 A.2d 1155
  • 86 Md. App. 642
  • 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 90

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When confronted with two proposed interpretations—one rendering legislation valid and the other invalid—courts generally attempt to read the enactment in a manner to render it valid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.