Hill v. Arthur
Citations
- 103 Wash. 187
- 173 P. 1092
- 1918 Wash. LEXIS 1036
Syllabus
<p>Continuance — Grounds—Absence of Witnesses — Diligence. It is not an abuse of discretion to refuse a continuance to secure tbe testimony of a witness upon a subject put in issue by tbe pleadings and a matter of dispute throughout the case, where it would have been merely cumulative and there was want of diligence in not subpoenaing him.</p> <p>Appeal — Preservation of Grounds — Exceptions to Instructions. Exception to instructions and to the sending of irrelevant instructions to the jury room, not called to the court’s attention, will not be considered on appeal.</p>
Judges: MacKintosh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.