Hill & Sandford, LLP v. Mirzai (In Re Mirzai)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining jurisdiction on appeal for 4 bankruptcy matters by analogizing to trial court’s remaining original jurisdiction during 5 pendency of appeal to an appellate court
• stating that, while appeal is pending, trial 27 court may still “correct clerical errors, take steps to maintain 28 the status quo, take steps that aid in the appeal, award 8 1 attorney's fees, impose sanctions, and proceed with matters not 2 involved in the appeal.”
• stating that, while appeal is pending, trial 27 court may still “correct clerical errors, take steps to maintain 28 the status quo, take steps that aid in the appeal, award 8 1 attorney's fees, impose sanctions, and proceed with matters not 2 involved in the appeal.”
• “[I]f a district court would be forbidden to act because of an appeal pending before the court of appeals, then both the bankruptcy appellate panel and the bankruptcy court would be similarly constrained.”
• “[I]f a district court would be forbidden 21 to act because of an appeal pending before the court of appeals, 22 then both the bankruptcy appellate panel and the bankruptcy 23 court would be similarly constrained.”
• “[I]f a district court would be forbidden 21 to act because of an appeal pending before the court of appeals, 22 then both the bankruptcy appellate panel and the bankruptcy 23 court would be similarly constrained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).