· 11/12/1999
Hill, Robert E. v. Henderson, William J
Citations
- 195 F.3d 671
- 338 U.S. App. D.C. 456
- 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 865
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 29744
- 1999 WL 1024668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a district court order dismissing one of several claims without making an explicit determination under Rule 54(b) is not a final decision subject to appellate review
- concluding that 19 Case: 18-10474 Date Filed: 07/16/2020 Page: 20 of 33 the “complex and somewhat conflicting pattern of reviewability” of transfer orders does not affect the reviewability of other pretransfer orders
- noting that when review is deferred, “it is less likely that the appellate court will face overlapping issues and circumstances on two occasions”
- noting that when review is deferred, “it is less likely that the appellate court will face overlapping issues and circumstances on two occasions”
- noting that when review is deferred, “it is less likely that the appellate court will face overlapping issues and circumstances on two occasions”
- finding no appellate jurisdiction over district court’s order that dismissed one claim and transferred remaining claims to another federal district court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Wald, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.