Skip to main content
· 11/12/1999

Hill, Robert E. v. Henderson, William J

Citations

  • 195 F.3d 671
  • 338 U.S. App. D.C. 456
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 865
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 29744
  • 1999 WL 1024668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court order dismissing one of several claims without making an explicit determination under Rule 54(b) is not a final decision subject to appellate review
  • concluding that 19 Case: 18-10474 Date Filed: 07/16/2020 Page: 20 of 33 the “complex and somewhat conflicting pattern of reviewability” of transfer orders does not affect the reviewability of other pretransfer orders
  • noting that when review is deferred, “it is less likely that the appellate court will face overlapping issues and circumstances on two occasions”
  • noting that when review is deferred, “it is less likely that the appellate court will face overlapping issues and circumstances on two occasions”
  • noting that when review is deferred, “it is less likely that the appellate court will face overlapping issues and circumstances on two occasions”
  • finding no appellate jurisdiction over district court’s order that dismissed one claim and transferred remaining claims to another federal district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Wald, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.