Skip to main content
· 6/15/2012

HILL, JAKE K. v. SENECA NATION OF INDIANS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing an argument that monitoring using Method 608 (a precursor to Method 608.3) was insufficient because “the test cannot ensure a permit holder complies with statutory water quality standards”
  • “Language is unambiguous if it has only one reasonable interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.