Hill Electric, Inc. v. Burkett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e are aware of [no appellate court case] that sets forth the proposition that a district court must stay proceedings against a customer in the very same litigation that will, regardless of the requested stay, go forward against the supplier.”
• “[W]e are aware of [no appellate court case] that sets forth the proposition that a district court must stay proceedings against a customer in the very same litigation that will, regardless of the requested stay, go forward against the supplier.”
• finding such a stay is not mandatory
• finding such a stay is not mandatory
• finding such a stay is not mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).