· 11/8/2007
Hiligh v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
Citations
- 935 A.2d 1070
- 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 655
- 2007 WL 3284027
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding the CRB’s determination that the term “total disability” is ambiguous because it does not specify “temporary total” or “permanent total” disability
- upholding the CRB‟s determination that the term 7 “total disability” is ambiguous because it does not specify “temporary total” or “permanent total” disability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washington, Farrell, Schwelb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.