· 6/1/1973
Hiler v. Domina
Citations
- 22 C.M.A. 655
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a published Department of Defense directive was entitled to the force and effect of law but that an agency turnkey manual was not
- concluding that “the failure [of the agency] to follow the [agency’s] manual did not prejudice plaintiff and did not have a substantial impact on the ultimate award”
- noting that an agency’s deviation from its own internal guidance to be arbitrary and capricious if such deviation results in prejudicial error
- “In these circumstances, the failure [of the agency] to follow the [agency’s] manual did not prejudice plaintiff and did not have a substantial impact on the ultimate award.”
- in which the court found that given the circumstances of the case, the agency’s failure to follow an agency guidance document in scoring technical and price factors was not of such significance that the decision should be set aside
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.