· 12/18/2003
Hildreth v. Tidewater Equipment Co.
Citations
- 838 A.2d 1204
- 378 Md. 724
- 2003 Md. LEXIS 824
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in Maryland, the alter-ego doctrine is applied “with great caution and reluctance”
- finding that there is “no universal rule as to the specific criteria that courts will consider in determining whether to apply the doctrine” but noting that courts typically consider a series of factors alongside the elements of the doctrine
- applying Maryland law without discussion to find that a shareholder of a New Jersey corporation could not be held personally liable for corporate debts
- reviewing Bart Arconti and discussing the high bar for veil piercing in Maryland
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.