Hilden v. Hurley Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the clearly erroneous standard to a protective order regarding a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition
• “[T]he parties essentially agreed that Suncor did not have to articulate any reason to justify its decision to revoke access; it could do so for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason whatsoever, without the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing interfering.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).