Hildebrand v. Topping

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a money judgment was not a final and appealable judgment where it was “intertwined” with a pending action for a final accounting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cronin v. McCarthy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-30· cited 19×
• BALDASSONE ON BEHALF OF BALDASSONE v. Gorzelanczyk
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-19· cited 17×
• Lozman v. Putnam
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-04-18· cited 17×
• Cross v. O'Heir
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-08-02· cited 8×
• Neumann v. Neumann
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-09-25· cited 6×
• Neumann v. Neumann Modified upon denial of rehearing
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-09-25

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crane Paper Stock Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-03-18· cited 60×
• Bloom v. Landy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-04-26· cited 33×
• Schlossberg v. Corrington
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-01-21· cited 27×
• In Re Estate of Tingos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-05-29· cited 15×
• Korziuk v. Korziuk
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1958-03-20· cited 15×
• Balcor Income Properties, Ltd. v. Arlen Realty, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-04-21· cited 12×
• Mayhew v. Craig
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1929-05-21· cited 9×
• Frink v. Ryan
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1841-12-15· cited 5×
• Williams v. Henkle
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1916-04-21· cited 2×