· 10/10/1960
Hilbert v. Pennsylvania
Citations
- 364 U.S. 839
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellants did not preserve an issue “[b]y failing to raise this issue in their original briefs”
- holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in reducing a fee award on this basis, though vacating and remanding other parts of the award
- not considering an issue appellants failed to raise in their original briefs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.