Skip to main content
· 3/24/2022

Hilary Dane Norris v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that § 13B is \[o]ne of the broader statutes in the category of 'crimes against public justice' \
  • summarizing evidence regarding alleged effect of defendant’s statements on course of investigation
  • defendant's statement was an exculpatory denial, \not a content-laden fabrication designed to send police off course\
  • drug recognition expert \testified to the typical physical and cognitive consequences of ingesting marijuana and alcohol\
  • one may violate statute making it a crime to mislead police officer in order to interfere with criminal investigation or proceeding by making a false statement or by intentionally omitting information and thereby causing statement to be misleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.