· 3/24/2022
Hilary Dane Norris v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that § 13B is \[o]ne of the broader statutes in the category of 'crimes against public justice' \
- summarizing evidence regarding alleged effect of defendant’s statements on course of investigation
- defendant's statement was an exculpatory denial, \not a content-laden fabrication designed to send police off course\
- drug recognition expert \testified to the typical physical and cognitive consequences of ingesting marijuana and alcohol\
- one may violate statute making it a crime to mislead police officer in order to interfere with criminal investigation or proceeding by making a false statement or by intentionally omitting information and thereby causing statement to be misleading
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.