Skip to main content
· 6/22/2017

Hikida v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

Citations

  • 219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 654
  • 12 Cal. App. 5th 1249
  • 82 Cal. Comp. Cases 679
  • 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In order that two properties, having no physical connection, may be regarded as one, in the assessment of damages for right of way, they must be so inseparably connected in the use to which they are applied as that the injury or destruction (continued…
  • “In order that two properties, having no physical connection, may be regarded as one, in the assessment of damages for right of way, they must be so inseparably connected in the use to which they are applied as that the injury or destruction (continued…

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.