Skip to main content
· 2/16/2010

Hijazi v. Permanent Mission of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations

Citations

  • 689 F. Supp. 2d 669
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13203
  • 2010 WL 532510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that even though some of the employee’s duties may have been clerical, the employee’s duties on the whole were intertwined with the defendant’s governmental function
  • determining that the plaintiff’s job was not “purely clerical” and “commercial” because she “worked[] just below the diplomatic level” and “sp[oke] on one occasion on behalf of Saudi Arabia at a United Nations conference”
  • “[In considering materials outside of the pleadings,] the Court is guided by that body of decisional law that has developed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.”
  • “[I]t would be clear that hiring purely clerical staff, even clerical staff that types diplomatic speeches, comes within the commercial activity exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John G. Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.