· 2/16/2010
Hijazi v. Permanent Mission of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations
Citations
- 689 F. Supp. 2d 669
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13203
- 2010 WL 532510
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that even though some of the employee’s duties may have been clerical, the employee’s duties on the whole were intertwined with the defendant’s governmental function
- determining that the plaintiff’s job was not “purely clerical” and “commercial” because she “worked[] just below the diplomatic level” and “sp[oke] on one occasion on behalf of Saudi Arabia at a United Nations conference”
- “[In considering materials outside of the pleadings,] the Court is guided by that body of decisional law that has developed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.”
- “[I]t would be clear that hiring purely clerical staff, even clerical staff that types diplomatic speeches, comes within the commercial activity exception.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John G. Koeltl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.