Highway Insurance v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that business supplying temporary labor to various firms was merely “conduit” through which employees were paid, thus supporting finding of borrowed employee relationship
• where the borrowing employer controlled all aspects of the plaintiff's work, it had the right to discharge the plaintiff from her work
• where the borrowing employer controlled all aspects of the plaintiffs work, it had the right to discharge the plaintiff from her work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).