Hight v. Hight

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• less than satisfactory relationship between father and daughter found to be of mutual origin; father’s argument that his contribution is a penalty and that daughter did not consult him about college did not make award abuse of discretion
• less than satisfactory relationship between father and daughter found to be of mutual origin; father's argument that his contribution is a penalty and that daughter did not consult him about college did not make award abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Milne v. Milne
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-22· cited 80×
• Towery v. Towery
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-03-04· cited 22×
• Gaddis v. Gaddis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-06-26· cited 20×
• Ragan v. Protko
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-11-28· cited 19×
• Imes v. Imes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-09-28· cited 18×
• In Re Marriage of Sreenan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-03-14· cited 17×
• Gibb v. Triezenberg
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-19· cited 5×
• Stecher v. Stecher
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-12-27· cited 4×
• Krypel v. Krypel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-11-20· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Elble v. Elble
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1968-10-12· cited 19×
• Crane v. Crane
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1964-01-21· cited 9×
• Van Nortwick v. Van Nortwick
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1967-09-05· cited 8×
• Mirsky v. Mirsky
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-02-18· cited 2×