Highstone v. Burdette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a stranger to the instrument is not estopped from contradicting it by parol evidence in order to prevent a fraudulent operation of it upon his interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bosley v. Prueter
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-02-21· cited 7×
• Hawes v. Weeden
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1901-11-25· cited 4×
• In re West Michigan Distributing Co.
  W.D. Michigan· 1967-05-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Inhabitants of Reading v. Inhabitants of Weston
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1830-06-15· cited 7×
• Highstone v. Burdette
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1884-06-25· cited 6×