Skip to main content
· 12/21/2001

Highmark, Incorporated v. Upmc Health Plan, Incorporated

Citations

  • 276 F.3d 160
  • 68 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1823
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27010
  • 2001 WL 1641243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “on an application for preliminary injunction, the plaintiff need only prove a prima facie case, not a certainty that he or she will win”
  • stating “on an application for preliminary injunction, the plaintiff need only prove a prima facie case, not a certainty that he or she will win”
  • “The Ad dealt with the scope and services offered by the insurers to their subscribers and thus concerned the ‘business of insurance.’”
  • “The equitable doctrine of unclean hands applies when a party seeking relief has committed an unconscionable act immediately related to the equity the party seeks in respect to the litigation.”
  • defense of unclean hands was not barred because the plaintiff ran an offending advertisement two years before the defendant’s advertisement, but because a nexus between the plaintiffs advertising and the defendant’s wrong was lacking
  • upholding injunction ordering health insurer to publish corrective advertisement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito, Barry, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.