Highlands Ranch University Park, LLC v. Uno of Highlands Ranch, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an LLC party in that case was “a single-purpose entity created for the sole purpose of entering into the lease at issue”
• holding that a party that had materially breached a contract was entitled to notice of the breach and a period of time to cure the 13 breach but that a party that had repudiated the contract was not entitled to notice or a period to cure or to retract their repudiation
• evaluating a lease that required lessee to construct building and that vested ownership in lessor upon termination
• evaluating a lease that required lessee to construct building and that vested ownership in lessor upon termination
• “Unless expressly agreed otherwise, a guarantor’s liability is generally coextensive with that of the principal.”
• “So long as the repudiating party refuses to retract and continues its repudiation, the nonbreaching party may still elect to treat such repudiation as a breach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).